KOSTKA GALLERY
presents the exhbition
ŠÁRKA KOUDELOVÁ (CZ), ŠTEFAN PAPČO (SK): I DON´T SEE STONES FOR THE MOUNTAINS, I DON´T SEE MOUNTAINS FOR THE
STONES
6. 11. – 28. 11. 2014
curator:
Petr Kovář
Do you still
reach for curator’s accompanying text with confidence? The incomprehensibility
of contemporary art has become the subject of articles on different levels, the
topic of lectures and conferences, miscellanies, professional books, and night
talk shows. An accompanying text to explain to the viewers what they see is far
from being a rule. Be it in our case a rite, a habit, or a bizarre indulgence,
or simply desire to get all available information and usual little items, it’s
quite obvious that it is not necessary to complement the picture with words
this time. This lack of understanding comes among other things from the fact
that art (the same as other fields) develops faster than what general public
can follow, the artists cross the boundaries with other disciplines at will,
still claiming the results to be art. From this perspective, the exhibition I
Don’t See Stones for the Mountains, I don’t See Mountains for the Stones appears to be a great move by the
gallery. In a “Nutshell” (in Czech, the word “Kostka” – cube – is used in this
phrase): A collector of minerals and a mountaineer! Why, they are people like
us, with normal pastime activities.
In the avalanche of
artistic pretenses and creative constructs, we viewers crave authenticity. We
crave stories. Testimonies. Fascination. We are fascinated if somebody is so
fascinated that they can change their lives strikingly depending on that
fascination. In our pursuit of authenticity in art, the modernist need to live
(one’s own) art is coming back. To become addicted to one’s hobby. Is it then
the artist’s extra-artistic interest that rescues (confirms) art for the
viewer?
With how many stones does a mountain begin? We might
rephrase the question of Marian Palla about a forest, but we would dig our own
grave, as a mountain is quite exactly defined as a relative elevation above the
surrounding terrain by three to six hundred meters. Both Štefan Papčo (1983)
and Šárka Koudelová (1987) create inspired by the mass of stone, only on a
different scale. If Papčo literally fills the gallery with a mock-up of a
mountain peak every inch of which he had felt with his body, Koudelová makes us
brood over meticulous brushstrokes, with which she touches just a small
fragment – maybe for as long as Papčo molded his complex. And this very
process, the artistic experience, becomes the revealing common key.
Štefan Papčo confronts us with the anxiety, drive and
adrenalin he himself experiences when climbing real rocks. With him we follow
the fate of a mountaineer who sleeps under the stars, of a statue its author
has moved into an inaccessible terrain on his own shoulders, or we circumvent
the mock-up that defies our full view – the installing solution reduces our
viewing angle like when climbing, we are physically confined and oppressed is
our need to observe, grasp a thing by capturing it with our own eyes, in the
need to achieve a bird’s eye view… for which one climbs to the top. For the
purpose of joint exhibition in the Kostka gallery, Štefan Papčo “made his own”
a climbing wall, which he cut into irregular chunks. Its monumentality of
boulder piling revokes the image of its original model; it is a mountain, but
it is also an avalanche, or at least its potential threat, making real
something that was not offered by the training wall. The installation does not
stand there just as a convincing illusion of a massif, but, in the spirit of
post modern ambiguity, it also suggests our game of “playing the mountains”.
Beside the atavist respect or romantic longing, it is also the artificial
satisfaction of both by means of a (sportive) climbing wall. The fact that for
the sculptural illusion of a mountain, its formerly realized illusion was
transformed as a ready-made, accentuates, despite otherwise even banal
straightforwardness, an underlying ironic, humorous line, creates a metaphor of
human endeavor, which, no matter how much redeemed physically, remains with one
crampon in the comic and self-delusion.
Šárka Koudelová leads us underneath the surface,
letting us, by means of her detailed micro-investigation, look into the
mineral’s structure, unveiling its growth, colorful ripening, movements of the
inanimate (?) matter. This serves her successively as a matrix of other
movements, crystallization of events, stories, of phenomena. The traditionally
understood eternal character of mountains is put in contrast with elusive
motives and observations. In the mirroring principle, both poles thus
positioned obtain the characteristics of their counterpart – mountain peaks in
which molten rock gushed out and crystallized, are accidental fleeting
creations of moments and changing mood, and a situation seen just from the corner
of one’s eye at a streetcar stop, or the awkwardness of surrealist works as the
topic of conversation acquire monumental timelessness, becoming firm part of a
structure that will “outlive us all”, or better, within whose grid we live. The
static is happening and the dynamic can be viewed as a solid structure. In this
oneness of matter and semantic emptiness of centers as if something from the
Eastern thought resounded, as transcribed e.g. by Roland Barthes in his Empire of Signs: “From the slope of the
mountains to the neighborhood intersection, here everything is habitat (…) the
place has no other limit than its carpet of living sensations, of brilliant
signs (flowers, windows, foliage, pictures, books); it is no longer the great
continuous wall which defines space, but the very abstraction of the fragments
of view (of the “views”) which frame me (...) the garden is a mineral tapestry
of tiny volumes (stones, traces of the rake on the sand), the public place is a
series of instantaneous events (...).”
The exhibition is conceived within a philosophical
framework of contrasts complementing each other: the mesmeric monumentality of
the sculptural gesture with obsessively precise details of many months of
painter’s record. The directness of this connection and the narrative solution
of the installation through which the viewer is lead, surprised, restricted, in
the good sense of the word, and made to take a stand from different points of
view, offers, I am not afraid to put it this way, a viewing attractiveness even
if the viewer will not turn into a reader of more floors of speleological and
mountaineering adventures.
Petr
Kovář